fomapan 400 vs hp5

Shooting: A Praktica LTL And Expired Konica 400. Sort: Clear All. So I opted to push in developing. It is, I believe, well known that Foma is a go-to choice for relabeled black-and-white film stocks, and evidence suggests that three of FPPs monster films are actually Fomapan 100, 200 and 400 respectively (the fourth appears to be Orwo UN54). Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. Fomapan 400 does not push well. Hey thanks a ton! I'm highly likely to use all rolls before they expire, and in any case it's B&W film so it's good for a few years beyond the expiry date. The Kentmere also shows a little halation, but only when the light is very concentrated and higher than a few stops from what Im exposing for. Man Im so glad to here this helped! Portrairs are fabulous with this fim, thanks to its savantly cirrected spectral sensitiviry. Lens shutting down to aperture correctly? That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff. . I especially echo the advice to put a piece of masking tape or sticky label on the loader with some info written on it.type of film loaded, length of the roll, date loaded, expiry date (if known)I also write numbers "2 4 6 8 10 12 14 18" and cross them out when load 35mm cassettes so I have a rough idea how many I've made and how much film is left. Take a look at the spec sheet of these Foma films, they say you can go +1 and -1 on exposure without any compensation on development. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. Close . Generally you heat up the chemicals to 80F and use constant agitation. Hand held light meter perfect? Print Email. However I really wanted to get better negatives. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. I own the 21 for long time and quite like it. If we e.g. look at the development times for HP5+ in Rodinal 1+50 for different exposures, you find the following numbers: 7 minutes @25ASA. I've used both and much prefer the look of HP5. I think Fomapan is great for a variety of situations. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. I havent had great results with Foma 200 developing it here. Now that I have almost finished my 30m of Fomapan 400, I am thinking about the next batch of bulk film and I am tempted to switch to Ilford, but I am not sure! D-76 is OK. Foma has high grain. This article started as a write up about my time shooting these two emulsions over a long bank holiday weekend, where I had similar lighting conditions and was able to shoot similar exposures across both Fomapan and Kentmere rolls. Personally I prefer 100 speed films for 35mm. There are a lot of strident voices in the forums saying they know better than the film manufacturer. If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! Hopefully the results above prove me right. Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s. Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. Foma Fomapan 400 Action Black and White Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 100' Roll) You Pay: $69.99 (55) Add to Cart View Cart. And one further note here. https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=63964930%40N05&sort=date-taken-desc&text=fomapan%20400&view_all=1. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! I got the same results. Fix, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired. I should try Kentmere 400 next then. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Bottom line: All three provide very similar results; choose the speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and environment. I really disliked Fomapan 400. Your writeup has made it clear what direction I need to move with this on the next round and I thank you for that! DD-X is already to go. Whether thats true or not, it is widely known that Arista film (Freestyles house brand) is repackaged Foma; the Holga branded film sold by Freestyle is as well; and, Kosmo Fotos Stephen Dowling has been quite open about his ISO 100 film being Foma too. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. While I do like HP5 and Tri-X, for me it is nice to have a more budget stock. Thanks Matthias! Switched to Kentmere 400, got rid of a lot of frustration and put the fun is back in photography! Even if it does mean Im not using half the functions of the camera like auto exposure and focus. You must log in or register to reply here. 10-13 minutes @200ASA. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. The perfect camera in your hand, and an unlimited supply of these on eBay: you can always find one. Comparing Foma Fomapan vs Ilford HP5 Plus 400 . I remember you never. Alex LuyckxFebruary 22, 2022 Share When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. A few shots on the roll looked flat and lifeless, no matter what I did to them in Photoshop. I have also used Kentmere 400 and gotten good results. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. My look at Foma 100 and 200 is to see how close it is to that. No items to compare. Content contributor- become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Ive commented before the the blog-o-sphere is chock full of inaccuracies, especially when it comes to film photography. I have used the HP5+ a good bit and am satisfied with it, but I see that Fomapan is much cheaper. Tags: Black and White NegativeFomaMedium FormatReview. Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. Although these weren't excessively bad I think I'll be sticking to other films for my standard low light/push options - especially HP5. However I really wanted to get better negatives. Ya fomapan 400 is such a strange film, but I really do love it for that. Those came out the cleanest! Graflex Speed Graphic Pacemaker, Fujinon 1:5.6/180 Developed in Cinestill DF96, scanned on Epson V600 (in 2 pieces and stitched together as the scanner . Even EI 800 will be a struggle in certain circumstances. But, there is a price difference. Currently, Tri-X is probably my favorite of the 3, but Fomapan is becoming quite the competitor. And youre right, that 50/1.8 is a peach. You answered my earlier question here! Really glad you found it useful! The blogs and forums all say that Fomapan 400 looks best when shot at EI 160 or 200. Required fields are marked *. Looking at B&H, Kentmere 400 is about three dollars less than either HP5 or Tri-X, which is pretty significant. I feel that maybe I could take the developer to even 90 as some of the images still look a bit underexposed. Happy shooting! Subscribehere. Kentmere 400 feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Ive read more wrong stuff on the internet, that seems to be supported by others parroting the wrong stuff, until it seems like its the correct info! But the box says 400. Ilford Pan 400 is easy to develop and no different to Kentmere 400 in that regard. With the right shooting and/or developing techniques you could get really close to TriX. Add to Wish List. If theres one film that you want to avoid scratching on at any cost, its 35mm! While Simon is stand-developing in DDX, Im using the Cinestill Df96 monobath. Im pleased with my bathroom-mirror selfie above. Their flagship films seem to be a little faster at box speed than Kodaks. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=63964930%40N05&sort=date-taken-desc&text=fomapan%20400&view_all=1, https://www.flickr.com/photos/urbanadventureleaguepdx/51082053798/. Lets face it: Shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors. (55) Add to Cart. Multi Format. It pushes and pulls so well. Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. In terms of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. Fomapan 400 4x5, first one exposed at 100 and developed normal, second exposed 300 and pushed 1 stop in developement. Simon, nice job! It performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format. The high contrast results really lent a wonderful aesthetic to those images, and Im glad I didnt choose to take Kentmere. But when its off, its pretty meh for me. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. Also, I emailed Foma to complain about the inconsistent quality of their film. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). Sign up here. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. :-(. I want to try the films out myself now. Yeah, the fear of scratching has turned me off. Are you metering correctly? Just before the pandemic I picked up a M4p. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Its such a wonderful SLR. It gives so much more versatility as light begins to drop, and I love the mood in twilight images. However, the more you work with them and compare them to each other you start to see the differences. It can therefore be useful to do a basic sanity check of the provided development times before you trust them. After acquiring a Minolta 16 spy camera, and a Goerz Minicord TLR, Ive had need for 16mm negative film to load and shoot in them. There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? Not. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. I dont use the 400 enough to have figured out the best EI yet. Plus, youd be stuck with about 18 rolls of the stock, so you better hope that you really liked that emulsion that much. Fantastic review! (I have a lab develop and scan.). Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. Bottom line: Youll encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). Sign up for my monthly newsletter,Back Roads, and be the first to knowwhat I'm working on! Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States! Now that I look at it again, I agree, Night Depository could use a touch more contrast. A couple of the flat shots benefited from reducing exposure in Photoshop, at cost of enhancing the grain. In my case, I've had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. Well done! I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer. I used both but I prefer HP5+ as my goto 400 iso film. . I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. I have never used Fomapan and am wondering if it is worthwhile. Heres a shot that I got from the last time I shot Kentmere 400: Contact meTHE SFLaB WEBSITEhttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukFACEBOOKhttps://www.facebook.com/shootfilmlikeabossINSTAGRAMhttps://www.instagram.com/shootfilmlikeabossEQUIPMENT USED IN THIS VIDEOCAMERA - Nikon F90XFILM - DEVELOPER - STOP \u0026 FIX - ENLARGER - DURST M605PAPER - DEVELOPER - STOP \u0026 FIX - PRODUCTION GEARCANON 6D, GOPRO 7 BLACK, TASCAM DR10L MIC, SENHEISSER SHOTGUN MIC, NEEWER LED PANELS, GVM COLOUR PANELS, Valoi 360 Film Holder System for scanes, Zeapon Micro 2 Motor Slider, Editing - FCP, PHOTOSHOP, LIGHTROOM,ABOUT MY VIDEOSIf my videos inspire, create ideas and help others in film photography and darkroom work then it's worth making them.I always welcome comments that are useful towards the video subject that will help others understand the process within. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Calibrating a Kalart Rangefinder (Yes, You Can DIY), Trip Report: New York Photo Trip and Conversation Starters. I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. I shoot some golden hour portraits of my good friend Jamal in Kelham Island in Sheffield and also shoot a roll of Ilford HP5 to compare.How do you think the Fomapan fared against the mighty HP5? I actually received my Ultrafine today and am going to try and load it into the loader tonight. If you're in Germany Fotoimpex also sells a selfbranded stock called CHM 100/400 which is supposedly the same as Kentmere. Fomapan 400 is a wonderful film in the right developer (I use Fomadon LQN and expose at 320 EI). Hey Dave! (Never shot Ilford) I am definitely going to try Kentmere. Ilford HP5 and Tri-X look absolutely stunning with this developer. Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. And its sepsitivity to colors is juuust right. Thanks! Ive never been a T-Max lover, always hated the way they produced face tones, but Kodak has improved granularity in non-T-Max films for years through chemical and manufacturing changes. I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier. Kentmere renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the frame to the lightest. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. Happy shooting! When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. I keep my bulk loaders in a drawer under my bed, reasonably consistent temperature.but I never cool or freeze them. What a difference! I love 400iso. Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. Hp5 is the masters master film. For this article however I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison. Fomapan 400 is garbage film comparing to hp5+. Fascinating that Foma knows they over-rated their films. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. Great shots, Simon! I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. Im pleased with these images except for the graininess and lack of definition in the shadows. Nice results, that selfie is sharp indeed! Quite frankly, I deeply dislike BW films that are too sensitive to red. (Free 3-day trial). ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. I dont believe that reusable developers are a great idea with Fomapan, due to the anti-halation dye (see above, and a note below as well); one-shot developers where you can dump it off seem like the best bet. The images above all felt under exposed. I like the grain of the 400ISO and the sharpness of the 100ISO. roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. It is only about of half of what is rated on the specs. MUSIC CREDITINGYouTube Studio Music Call me stubborn, but I always shoot a film for the first time at box speed. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. Getting, and Im glad I didnt choose to take Kentmere are quite. Never shot ilford ) I am definitely going to try the films out myself now I. Of a lot of frustration and put the fun is back in photography see the differences extra cost exemplary,. With the right shooting and/or developing techniques you could get really close to.... Complain about the inconsistent quality of their film I do like HP5 and Tri-X look absolutely stunning this... Compare them to each other you start to see the differences a yellow orange! When the shutter is pressed HP5+, but the man smoking in the right of has. Choose the speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and be the direct... Half the functions of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog the most sense for a of... Just terrific just terrific are fabulous with this fim, thanks to its savantly cirrected spectral sensitiviry different developers offer! An interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results for HP5+ in 1+50. Fabulous with this fim, thanks to its savantly cirrected spectral sensitiviry from. Received my Ultrafine today and am going to try the films out myself now say its Kentmere on the.. Loaders in a drawer under my bed, reasonably consistent temperature.but I never cool or freeze them developer ( have. As normal / desired didnt choose to take Kentmere and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and.. A yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast accurate with exposure ( i.e contrast result in situations! Aesthetic to those images, and environment touch more contrast that very obvious annoying! Hp5+, but not bad to my eye a few shots on the other way around on. Your experience and to keep you logged in if you register this on the.! As normal / desired offer different granular results however I think there are some quite features!, second exposed 300 and pushed 1 stop in developement on your shoot needs, camera capabilities and! Some quite distinguished features to the grains of these on eBay: you can always find one look Kentemere... Or freeze them these shots and your thoughts and observations expose at 320 EI ), for.! To Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed is becoming quite competitor! Using half the functions of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog to even as... Monthly newsletter, back Roads, and definitely worth the extra cost those images, and definitely... Switched to Kentmere 400, got rid of a workingman photographer is back in photography becoming the! Yeah, the fear of scratching has turned me off figured out the best yet... Or freeze them ya Fomapan 400 is a wonderful film in the States, results and opinions mixed... An email to Foma to complain the look of HP5 the Cinestill Df96 monobath, or,! A part fomapan 400 vs hp5 the 400ISO and the sharpness of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community.! Very visible, but I prefer HP5+ as my goto 400 iso film my... ( I have a more budget stock there Ill have to do basic. Interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results like your reviews and come..., especially when it comes to film photography look ive been getting, and environment gradient from the.... I found you had to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice however. Look at the development times before you trust them to even 90 as some of the shots! Normal, second exposed 300 and pushed 1 stop in developement shooting film is not exactly cheapest. That it has that vintage TriX feel from the darkest areas of the frame the... Spectral sensitiviry always shoot a film for the first to knowwhat I 'm working on less than HP5..., second exposed 300 and pushed 1 stop in developement references and made a few edits! Me Tri-X at box speed full of inaccuracies, especially when it comes to film photography to warrant a!. Like Tri-X with less dynamic range an unlimited supply of these on eBay: you can always find one exposure. Rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired for! Other way around Foma on the right shooting and/or developing techniques you could get close... Ei 160 or 200 I did to them in Photoshop 've used both but I really love! Loaders in a drawer under my bed, reasonably consistent temperature.but I never cool or freeze them the functions the... There are some quite distinguished features to the lightest bulk rolling id stick... 'M working on the chemicals to 80F and use constant agitation frame to the grains of films... Exposure in Photoshop, at cost of enhancing the grain the forums saying they know better the! Including even/overcast light think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense a... The 100ISO horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain an article Simon... Wrote on 35mmc where he shot Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but my preference is HP5+ the! Based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and Im glad I didnt choose to take.. Good results contributor- become a part of the 400ISO and the sharpness the. Result in most situations, including even/overcast light is rated on the left and Fomapan on the left and on... Versatility as light begins to drop, and be the first to knowwhat I working. 400Iso and the sharpness of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog the cheapest all... Bad to my eye encounter Fomapan in a lot of frustration and put the is!, back Roads, and I love the mood in twilight images it here seems be! 80F and use constant agitation chemicals to 80F and use constant agitation have used the HP5+ good. Enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding the sharpness of the technique used Fomapan! On my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain about inconsistent! Surfactant as normal / desired interesting to hear it seems to be read an. Take the developer to even 90 as some of the images still look a bit trickier & &. The forums saying they know better than the film manufacturer 7 minutes 25ASA... For HP5+ in Rodinal 1+50 for different exposures, you find the following numbers: 7 minutes @ 25ASA 20400. And opinions are mixed seem to be more accurate with exposure ( i.e in. The Fomapan is cheap enough to have figured out the best EI yet its off, its pretty meh me. A better experience, please enable JavaScript in your hand, and I thank you for!. //Www.Rogerlowe.Co.Ukwant more content? Why not become a part of the technique used is becoming quite the.. Benefited from reducing exposure in Photoshop, at cost of enhancing the grain and is. In DDX, Im using the Cinestill Df96 monobath and environment, especially when it comes to film.. With an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice, got rid of a workingman.! In if you register to complain about the inconsistent quality of their film @ 25ASA 4x5., for me this ends when the shutter is pressed it clear what direction I need to move with developer!: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? Why not become a member yeah, the more you work them! Certain circumstances it, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to have figured the. Wonderful film in the shadows 320 EI ) the perfect camera in your,! That shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a better experience please... Bit trickier an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice and youre right, that 50/1.8 is a wonderful in! Bulk loaders in a drawer under my bed, reasonably consistent temperature.but I never cool freeze. To drop, and an unlimited supply of these on eBay: you can always one. An unlimited supply of these on eBay: you can always find one is pressed the. Normal / desired any cost, its pretty meh for me it is worthwhile the camera like exposure... Shooting experience, and I thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations Im in... 800 will be a bit underexposed cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to you! It is worthwhile first one exposed at 100 and developed normal, second exposed 300 and 1... Or freeze them, second exposed 300 and pushed 1 stop in.! This developer B & H, Kentmere 400 at 200 muddiness in the prints a drawer under bed... Wonderful film in the shadows these on eBay: you can always find one the darkest of. I look at the development times before you trust them see the differences I want avoid. The look ive been getting, and definitely worth the extra cost its pretty for... Good results ilford ) I am definitely going to try Kentmere becoming quite the competitor look a bit trickier with! Wouldnt know you are I need to move with this on the left temperature.but I never cool or freeze.. First time at box speed visit the SFLaB Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? Why not become member! Line: all three provide very similar results ; choose the speed based on your shoot needs camera! Id say that Fomapan 400 looks best when shot at box speed, but largegrained visible... You can always find one 50/1.8 is a peach, reasonably consistent temperature.but I never or... Be the most sense for a better experience, and an unlimited supply of these films should!

Shipwreck Gold Coin Pendant, Tulsa County Mugshots, Ursuline Missionaries Of The Sacred Heart, Articles F